Quote:
Originally Posted by Rfootdude
What the guy did to Lain (according to her version of events) of grabbing her butt on the way out is likely an act constituting the outrage of her modesty, or in layman terms, molest. This would be in clear contravention of section 354 of the Penal Code, which states that any such act, which the perpetrator intends to or knows it is likely to outrage the modesty of the victim, would constitute an outrage of modesty and would expose the perpetrator to jail time, caning and/or fines.
Now some of the commenters above have stated their opinions about how it may be arguable that the act in question may not have been an outrage of Lain's modesty given the context of a session. Now while it is true that the police/prosecution and/or courts may take this interpretation should the act have been committed in the middle of a session, it is clear that this act occurred after the session had lapsed and he was in the process of exiting the room. Given that Lain had not consented to allowing him to perform such an action on her, it is likely that this would be construed as an outrage of modesty.
So my advice would be to be careful when you come out to play and don't land yourself in unnecessary trouble with the law.
|
Objection! Hearsay and incompetent!
Since when did the SBF court appoint you as public prosecutor?
You may get your rocks off dispensing whatever advice this is, but no one asked for it. Save it for your job as a lawyer, if you're one in the first place.