[whiteangelcsh]

Personally, not withstanding and not disagreeing wif the statements by fellow bros and sis, I would opined tt it ultimately voiced down to how one would look upon the 'relationship'. How many lines is one gonna cross? It's juz like platonic love. How many would really be able to resist the temptation of lust for the case of platonic love and to maintain a relationship without sexual aspect? Similiarly to FB, it's how one would maintain his/her stand. There are rules set, and one or both parties might cross the line inevitably during the process.

I would reckon tt it's the mentality of one's maturity over such relationship. Pure sexual? FB who shares inner thoughts without crossing the line? Or otherwise. It takes both parties to understand how each other feels and want in this FB relationship. Some may be comfy while some may not. End of the day, lust would took over. I do agree tt mixing sensation and senses are messy and would get out of hand if not handled tactfully. But at certain point of time in our life, despite whether attached or married, one would hv needs, not juz sexual needs but tt of a confide. Someone whom u juz like to relax, share moments/thoughts, hv sex and then go back to ur normal life. Pervert? Disordered mental? Or juz pure alternate way of confiding? U decide. Simply put in my own words, it's sharing of thoughts with the elements of sex. For wife/gf/bf case, it'll be making love in the same manners. I may be sound confusing but tts how I looked upon it. Nonetheless, I do agree tt family is impt. End of the day, it's the support frm family tt drives u thru difficulties.

My point here is: Friends with Benefits - someone who u can share ur senses, period.