Quote:
Originally Posted by broken_heart
"The professional approach is to find out the legal impediment or obstacle to the entry and provide sufficient and good supporting materials to ICA."
This one makes quite a loads of sense. Thanks to bro ICAlaw101. I think the potential problem that we're likely to face is ICA's black box in terms of not releasing in any way guidelines or restrictions that they use in determining whether or not to give green light or not to a particular case. Which I can somehow understand from their point of view, but it makes life a lot lot harder for ppl like me.
Which means we'll never know which part of our appeal is wrong / insufficient, and what we need to do or include for the next appeal. That's why I'm sincerely appealing for all bros out there with success stories to share so that we can all learn and apply.
Congrats to bro Shysaint!
|
THanks for well wishes
The authority need you to provide sufficient evidences and documents to support the appeal and proof that this is a genuine case .... simply as that , thats why i could take up from 6 mths to a year before the whole thing is approved ...
everytime you re-appeal, they write back and tell you they need additional documents .. this and that, and within 2 weeks if you submit, the re-appeal deems to have lapse ...
so everytime , u have to rush to get the documents ...
One thing that I realise is that , the faster they reply, the chances of getting it approved is lower , although it makes no logical sense , but then thats why I found out ...