[S i l v i a]

Originally Posted by nuclearkid

I have to respectfully disagree with you on that. Would personally value a meaningful companionship over sex, though it would be a bonus if both aspects are equally good. For the record, am a guy. And to me, if a woman decides that sex is not a priority in her life, its her perogative and her right. I don't recall my wedding vows explicitly stating sex-on-demand is a given but nonetheless, I respect her wishes and if that's the way it is, so be it.

But wouldn't it be fishy or funny if both of u really didn't have sex (let say once per mth the minimum) ?

Wouldn't he/she will find it fishy somewhere else...?

Anyway love is the most powerful meaning to marriage but sex is a also a powerful meaning to a marriage, I think both of them must come in a package! Cannot only have 1 nia.