RAW and surivive ?

starwind · #1 16-09-2005, 03:39 PM

just curious, did any brothers here did it raw with WL / FL and nvr kena any thing ?

thebody.com says that even we whack raw with a infected pers the chances are also 0.1.-0.3 per episode .. this is true or what ?

bongster · #2 17-09-2005, 02:26 PM

U wanna take the risk bo?? One samster, went to batam, run out of condom but since booked e gal for e whole nite tot dun fuck waste money, in e end fuck RAW, end of the day kanna HIV, this is a true story, wanna believe or not up to u.

STK01 · #3 17-09-2005, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bongster

One samster, went to batam, run out of condom but since booked e gal for e whole nite tot dun fuck waste money, in e end fuck RAW, end of the day kanna HIV, this is a true story, .

This can be a classic example for the importance of using CDs..

idunnoe · #4 17-09-2005, 08:33 PM

Bro, y take the risk?

Prevention is always better than Cure, Furthermore, there is no cure yet.

Be safe than Sorry. haha

iwata · #5 18-09-2005, 03:03 AM

My bro.
U r Playing with fire. U nv know if they have any diseases.

daneman · #6 18-09-2005, 10:24 AM

This ratio and precentage thing is very dangerous. This ratio and percentage does not take into account the presence of sores, wounds and other factors. Anyway, playing this game is like playing russian roulette. How do you know that the first chamber in your gun is not loaded. Do not take chances. Like what other bros say RAW is WAR. Cap on for all times!

like2bonk · #7 18-09-2005, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starwind

just curious, did any brothers here did it raw with WL / FL and nvr kena any thing ?

thebody.com says that even we whack raw with a infected pers the chances are also 0.1.-0.3 per episode .. this is true or what ?

Do u mean by 0.1 to 0.3 as in 10 to 30% chance of infection? Then that is very high. Statistically need to fuck raw 3 times. But if you are saying it is only 0.1 to 0.3%, which I think it is, then the chance is very low. But one must be very careful when using statistics like this. Some STDs are quite contagious whilst others are not so. It is BEST to be SAFE.

like2bonk · #8 18-09-2005, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by like2bonk

Do u mean by 0.1 to 0.3 as in 10 to 30% chance of infection? Then that is very high. Statistically need to fuck raw 3 times. But if you are saying it is only 0.1 to 0.3%, which I think it is, then the chance is very low. But one must be very careful when using statistics like this. Some STDs are quite contagious whilst others are not so. It is BEST to be SAFE.

I found out that the statistics referred to above pertains to HIV infection. I think we are too concern with HIV when other forms of STDs are ignored. I've posted an article from body.com in another thread that uncircumcised males are 9 times more likely to get infected with HIV. Again, it is BEST to be SAFE.

iloveoversea · #9 18-09-2005, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by like2bonk

I found out that the statistics referred to above pertains to HIV infection. I think we are too concern with HIV when other forms of STDs are ignored. I've posted an article from body.com in another thread that uncircumcised males are 9 times more likely to get infected with HIV. Again, it is BEST to be SAFE.

uncircumcised males are more risky? i tot circumcised and head protrudting have more area exposed?

MugenEG9 · #10 18-09-2005, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bongster

U wanna take the risk bo?? One samster, went to batam, run out of condom but since booked e gal for e whole nite tot dun fuck waste money, in e end fuck RAW, end of the day kanna HIV, this is a true story, wanna believe or not up to u.

Agreed, paper statistics is one thing, reality is another. As bro bongster & others have said...be responsible & cap up! "dont be silly, get that cap on ur willy!"

)

BigBoy123 · #11 18-09-2005, 12:08 PM

from what i know anal sex and raw fucking is the most risky of getting HIV
follow by bbbj , licking pussy ,hj and lastly frenching .. Correct?

daneman · #12 18-09-2005, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBoy123

...hj and lastly frenching .. Correct?

I do not know. In my opinion, i think frenching is more dangerous than HJ. Thr reason is that for frenching, you are exposed to the saliva, and possible blood from any sores, ulcers. And if you have open wounds in your mouth, there is a risk. But for HJ, you are only at risk, if there are cuts or open wounds on the gal's hands. And looking at the amount of people infected in the US, from what i know, there has been so far 1 incident of HIV contraction from french kissing but nil from HJ, does that mean HJ is safer than frenching? In addition, the HIV virus cannot survive well outside the body, and therefore blood on the surface of the hand, may be denatured by air. Just my 1.5 cents worth. Hope to hear from other bros.

daneman · #13 18-09-2005, 12:40 PM

Bros,
A cool risk assessment chart to check out:
http://www.babeland.com/sexinfo/feat...sessment-table

lightweaver · #14 18-09-2005, 12:54 PM

aiyah, whether the risk is 0.0001% to 10%, it doesnt mean anything if u kena after RAW rite?

Dun care if gahmen say more jobs is created if i cant find job. Stupid statistics

BigBoy123 · #15 18-09-2005, 02:24 PM

for those pple who got gum dieases that means they cannot french kiss?