![]() |
|
The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene Had a great time with a government approved broad in Geylang? Tell us all about it! No FREELANCE crap here please. Legal commercial sex only. Threads about illegal Geylang whores carry a reputation point penalty. |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#2596
|
|||
|
|||
Re: L8h43
Quote:
![]() |
#2597
|
|||
|
|||
Re: L8h43
Quote:
|
#2598
|
|||
|
|||
Re: L8h43
All the fake frs on g17 here created by okt and his cronies kakis using multiple accounts to mislead people into taking her..when in fact g17 is a dead fish 1)she choose to shower alone..spending more than 15 minutes alone shower clearly time wasting tactic 2) she demands tips if you want to do bbbj or kissing or frenching..She Specifically asked me to pay her the tips first not after the session 3) the way she demanded the tips like the queen or president style.she raised her right hand and pointed at my face
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#2599
|
|||
|
|||
Re: L8h43
based on the forum review and previous patterns, bowiek's review appears to have inconsistencies that raise suspicion about its credibility. here are key observations:
1. contradictory statements: in one post, bowiek claims that g17 was "not really ang pai quality" and that "many bros hyped her up." however, he contradicts himself by stating that she was actively pestering for tips. if she was truly lackluster, why would she be hyped up by many others? 2. repeated negative focus on tips: bowiek repeatedly emphasizes that g17 asks for tips, portraying it as a major flaw. this could be an attempt to paint a negative image rather than providing an objective review. 3. different descriptions of the same experience: in one comment, he describes her as "average only," and in another, he goes into extensive detail about the session, focusing on negatives. the tone suggests an exaggeration of flaws. 4. similarity to previous fake reviews: the phrasing and complaints are strikingly similar to previous negative reviews found in these forums, where certain users may have an agenda against specific working ladies. 5. possible influence from external factors: there is a chance that this review was influenced by personal bias, a failed expectation, or even competition among working ladies, where certain individuals attempt to damage the reputation of others. conclusion: the way his review is framed—with exaggerated negatives, contradicting points, and an overemphasis on tipping—suggests that it may be misleading or exaggerated rather than a genuine critique. further verification from multiple independent sources would be needed to confirm its authenticity. |
#2600
|
|||
|
|||
Re: L8h43
Quote:
![]() |
#2601
|
|||
|
|||
Re: L8h43
bowiek's latest comments continue to follow the same pattern of exaggerated negativity, inconsistencies, and questionable motives. here’s a breakdown of key observations:
1. exaggerated claims & repetitive criticism: bowiek repeatedly accuses g17 of being a "dead fish" and overly demanding when it comes to tips. the emphasis on time-wasting tactics, showering alone, and using her phone instead of drying herself is overly detailed, making it seem like an effort to damage her reputation rather than just sharing a bad experience. 2. contradictions & bias: earlier, he mentioned g17 pestering for tips but also claimed many bros hyped her up. if she were truly so bad, why would she be hyped? now, he adds that she pestered him to extend the session, yet he already described her as unprofessional and unpleasant. why would he think she wanted to extend a bad session? this contradiction suggests exaggeration. 3. similarity to past fake reviews: his review structure and phrasing match previous negative reviews on working ladies, where specific individuals continuously target certain girls. the heavy focus on "fake frs" created by okt and cronies is a common tactic used to discredit positive reviews. 4. emotional manipulation in writing style: bowiek attempts to appeal to emotions by claiming g17 “manipulates soft-hearted customers.” this kind of generalization is a tactic used to influence readers rather than provide an unbiased experience. conclusion: bowiek's review appears to be another exaggerated attempt to discredit g17. his contradictions, repeated emphasis on tipping, and similarity to previous suspected fake reviews suggest that his account is likely biased or agenda-driven rather than a fair assessment. verification from independent sources would be necessary to determine the true nature of g17’s service. |
#2602
|
|||
|
|||
Re: L8h43
The truth hurts...you are the okt defending your g17..I just post my honest and truthful review on g17..for so long you and your cronies post fake reviews to lure customers to g17 den..and she milked them dry...the truth hurts because someone finally expose your g17 scam ...the good reviews on g17 have been exaggerated by your kakis to bring in victims and unsuspecting customers or newbies to the slaughterhouse..in fact many of your fake frs here on g17 exaggerated the so call good services she claim she can do..when in fact she don't bbbj..she don't french kiss .she prefers to shower alone rather than with customers..my review is honest and truthful yet you are worried that the g17 scam kena exposed..The reason why you fear the truth ..people will come to know g17 is a dead fish .a con artist...she doesn't even want to shower together with customers
![]() |
#2603
|
|||
|
|||
Re: L8h43
Quote:
|
Advert Space Available |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|