Coupleswing looking for M for a MMF session - Page 2

Coupleswing · #16 09-02-2013, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jasdude

The rules of the game is ( excuse me for being crude ) whoever rules the pussy dictates the rules. Using your example of geylang. The pimp dictates the price, dictates the duration and dictates the place. Its a simple, take it or leave it rules of barter! You want something you have to pay a certain price to get it.

To be fair to you, you are not wrong to say so if the TS is a newbie where his intentions are not clear BUT please do your homework on the TS. He is not a greenhorn swinger or someone out to make a quick buck using his woman. I can vouch for that because he came for my group swing before. I took his virgin swing! which was a few years ago.

Haha..hi Jasdude. Didn't come into swing scene for some time.we are always newbie. Hehe. Just when I though I lost my virgin..u found another n lose it for us.

but Nwadays not easy to find a nice couple.at times ppl will find it too good to be truth to get a 3some and says some funny comment.lol. But the swing party By u was a memorable one. Happy new year!!

Coupleswing · #17 09-02-2013, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemonicSS

Hi coupleswing,

Just to ask, with no offense intended, wouldn't you be bothered that you are entering into the premises of a stranger?

Well, what I am wondering is how you go about having fun when you may not know the mind of your newly met friend. He may be one that enjoys putting a hidden cam somewhere around and having a possibility of extortion from you later on.

With the room being yours instead... it kinda reduces that risk, that someone might hide a thing or two around... dont you think?

Cheers and enjoy the dicks, MMF is always fun...

Hey some of the senior shld have and yr Qns. But to enhance it,I would say if u want to worry so much there will be no fun and the point is that we r out for some nice kinky fun. Secondly like what CB says we are no celebrities and worst case anyone record it and it will only be watched for few times and others hidden video would have overtaken us haha.search hidden couple hiddens video n u will see thousands of it.lastly to minimize exposure we always dim the lights...even if it's recOrded it wont be clear and to anyone Watchin it I don't think they will see much or enjoys it but to imagine n visualize what's going on. Heh cheers

DemonicSS · #18 09-02-2013, 06:25 PM

Wow... my reply took almost a day to be posted...lol...anyway.. we kinda like the indiscretions... so standing infront of the reception is abit usual for us..lol... but yeah.. its a good way to prevent anything from happening.. And in a way it is true... such things.. if it does surface.. would just be another quick porn to be watched and forgotten about.. and yes...we worry too much...lol, but its ok... we like to take our time on things. Hope you guys have fun for the New Year... Cheers

roughkink · #19 09-02-2013, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColourBlindx2

One thing to add, prostitutes are obliged to entertain customers no matter how the customers look like or behave. Cause they have to make a living and they decided to take up prostitution as a job.

But swingers are not pimps and whores. We are self-respecting people who know what we like and we are not afraid to pursue our desires. And we have the right to choose who to share the experience with, and not entirely keen to give free fucks to any Tom, Dick or Harry.

So screw your dickhead towards FL Dome instead, thankiewverymuch

Colourblind f

If you don't want to be treated like a pimp and whore, then don't behave like one.

If money is out of the equation, and you want photos and all to choose, I really don't see a problem with it. And don't give me the same excuse as superwhitee - yes, while you are offering a girl to screw, it isn't as if the couple isn't getting enjoyment out of it - pursing your "desires" as you said. In other words, an equivalent exchange.

When you introduce a monetary aspect into the requirement, then that changes how you are being dealt with.

It is one thing to say "I don't have a place available, hotel a must". It is quite another to say "must have 4-5 star hotel". Do you see the difference? I am accomodating to the former - the latter, then the intent is obvious.

If the facade of your MMF is essentially what you can get out of the other party financially during the session, then it works both ways. Which is:

- Are you worth a 4-5 star hotel room in the first place?

I would approach the whole thing as nothing more than a transaction.

In a purely meet only situation, I fully respect the couple's right to choose.

However when the couple starts putting in requirements that involves fees or goods of value, then on what basis should the couple be allowed to dictate the terms?

I stand by what I say - I treat you exactly the way you behave.

roughkink · #20 09-02-2013, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superwhitee

Come on guys, cut them some slack will ya. Not often do you see couples allowing you to screw their partner (mmf and not swing). All they ask for is someone to be able to host. Sure you can have you doubts, but insulting couples is not a nice thing to do. If you can make a better offer than TS, sure, bring your partner (spouse/gf/fb) out here.

Instead of prowl the forum for free sex, it would be nice if everyone can contribute positively to make this forum a better place. Now i wonder where are the the senior couples?

Peace out

First of all, MMF is *still* swinging (in the context of a couple looking for a 3rd, not a commercial for pay settings).

Insulting and stating facts are two different things. You can take my post and compare it with the TS's initial post - I have said nothing that wasn't already in their post. I did not put words in their mouth.

roughkink · #21 09-02-2013, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jasdude

The rules of the game is ( excuse me for being crude ) whoever rules the pussy dictates the rules. Using your example of geylang. The pimp dictates the price, dictates the duration and dictates the place. Its a simple, take it or leave it rules of barter! You want something you have to pay a certain price to get it.

To be fair to you, you are not wrong to say so if the TS is a newbie where his intentions are not clear BUT please do your homework on the TS. He is not a greenhorn swinger or someone out to make a quick buck using his woman. I can vouch for that because he came for my group swing before. I took his virgin swing! which was a few years ago.

While I disagree that in all situations the couple gets to call the shots (see my earlier reply), your analogy is also seriously flawed.

For the prostitute, using their services is a purchase. This is not the same as a barter. In the former, the seller dictates the terms, in the latter, it is a negotiation based on what both parties have to offer, and the terms they are willing to settle on.

What I dislike, is how someone says he wants to barter, but behaves like a service provider, and I am telling that party in the face exactly how I feel (which is exactly what I do in any other situation - I have no qualms giving a tongue lashing to an incompetent waiter in public, and an accompanying note to the manager / parent company the following day).

Whether they have done it once or a hundred times is not the issue - the issue here is intent, as I read it from their post.

ColourBlindx2 · #22 09-02-2013, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roughkink

If you don't want to be treated like a pimp and whore, then don't behave like one.

If the facade of your MMF is essentially what you can get out of the other party financially during the session, then it works both ways. Which is:

- Are you worth a 4-5 star hotel room in the first place?

I would approach the whole thing as nothing more than a transaction.

In a purely meet only situation, I fully respect the couple's right to choose.

However when the couple starts putting in requirements that involves fees or goods of value, then on what basis should the couple be allowed to dictate the terms?

I stand by what I say - I treat you exactly the way you behave.

Oh Puh-lese. Do not group commercial swingers with those who swing as a lifestyle.

To an extent, i agree with you when it comes to MMF and then getting the single male to host; it can be viewed as a transaction. However, it is also a display of sincerity to the couple. I have heard of MANY singles who ends up being a no-show. (And yes i have heard of MANY couples who never appear. Happens to everyone!)

Standing by what you say? As a summary, you want your cake and eat it. So do a lot of men in this forum

Colourblind f

Coupleswing · #23 10-02-2013, 02:21 AM

Hey guys let's just ignore that guy..He is just on different frequency,and his indisplay of intelligence N debate is not well appreciated.leave him alone and he will walk away.happy new year!!

ColourBlindx2 · #24 10-02-2013, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coupleswing

Hey guys let's just ignore that guy..He is just on different frequency,and his indisplay of intelligence N debate is not well appreciated.leave him alone and he will walk away.happy new year!!

Happy Lunar New Year!!

He is on Free-Lunch Frequency

Collect angpows and distribute angpows!! Yippeeeeee!!

Colourblind f

roughkink · #25 11-02-2013, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColourBlindx2

Oh Puh-lese. Do not group commercial swingers with those who swing as a lifestyle.

To an extent, i agree with you when it comes to MMF and then getting the single male to host; it can be viewed as a transaction. However, it is also a display of sincerity to the couple. I have heard of MANY singles who ends up being a no-show. (And yes i have heard of MANY couples who never appear. Happens to everyone!)

Standing by what you say? As a summary, you want your cake and eat it. So do a lot of men in this forum

Colourblind f

Probably you didn't read my post in its entirety. Let me quote the relevant portion:

"It is one thing to say "I don't have a place available, hotel a must". It is quite another to say "must have 4-5 star hotel". Do you see the difference? I am accomodating to the former - the latter, then the intent is obvious."

I have never said I was looking for a free fuck as you implied. In fact, paying is not a problem (see underlined - you can also scroll to previous posts to verify the exact wording - not a word inserted or removed).

The issue here, is the attitude. For example:

"I don't have a place available, hotel a must" - this is a need. The room is to facilitate the meet.

"must have 4-5 star hotel" - this is greed.

In case you have difficulty understanding english again, this is not a reluctance to pay for a high end hotel.

To use a simple analogy:

If someone wants a loan to pay for his rent, that's not an issue.

If someone wants a loan to go on a shopping spree, then I would say no.

It is not the amount - it is why you are asking for it.

As you said:

"Do not group commercial swingers with those who swing as a lifestyle"

If the demands of a couple are more than what is needed (note I am referring to this specific case, not as a general blanket statement), then does that not make them commercial swingers?

If so, you are also not differentiating between how couples should be treated in either case.

You are also not assessing things rationally - your statements (as well as other couples) were knee jerk reactions from the start. I doubt any of you bothered to read things thoroughly but simply responded on the basis you're a swinging couple defending another supposedly swinging couple.

roughkink · #26 11-02-2013, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coupleswing

Hey guys let's just ignore that guy..He is just on different frequency,and his indisplay of intelligence N debate is not well appreciated.leave him alone and he will walk away.happy new year!!

You're the one incapable of a coherent response.

fdome · #27 11-02-2013, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superwhitee

Come on guys, cut them some slack will ya. Not often do you see couples allowing you to screw their partner (mmf and not swing).

Couple? shall we check the ROM cert

Quote:

Originally Posted by roughkink

First of all, MMF is *still* swinging (in the context of a couple looking for a 3rd, not a commercial for pay settings).

.

MMF is 3p, not swinging

steadyboy · #28 11-02-2013, 11:33 PM

aiya whats the big deal? u dont feel like springing for a 4 star hotel then perhaps you can find other couples that will settle for budget hotel accomodation better still even perhaps PAY you to MMF with them? hows that sound?

coupleswing are not the couple for you. I am sure you can try others.

Presidental · #29 12-02-2013, 12:23 AM

Had personally meet up with coupleswing some time back (on a swinging outing).

Both are nice friendly people, and genuine sincere and fun to have around.
And nice gentlemanly guy with a hot babe, what more can us guy / couple ask for.

I guess all these negative comments come about as most of the newbies may not had meet them before , or doubt they are for real.

I seen them, i shake their hands, kiss her boobs, and vouch with my hands (and legs) that they are real and a sincere couple.

Just drop all the nonsense and get on with the fun!

Happy new year bro coupleswing! huat ah!

roughkink · #30 12-02-2013, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fdome

Couple? shall we check the ROM cert

MMF is 3p, not swinging

Swinging does not necessarily have to be couples:

http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swin...402419/20.html

http://www.swingersboard.com/forums/...p/t-29332.html

MMF is an indication of the number of participants and specific arrangement, it is not a mutually exclusive term from swinging.

If you want to correct me, verify your facts first.